Pros, especially those covering weddings and events, will reach for an 24-70mm F2.8. If you prefer a bit more lens, you can reach for an F4 zoom. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR Review Many reviewers criticized the lens heavily for its performance, claiming it to be a soft lens when compared to its predecessor, the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G. And some even put it as the winner in the “worst lens release of 2015” category. Did Nikon engineers really screw up in updating one of the most popular pro-grade lenses? Above: Nikon 24-70/2.8E ED VR on a D810 at 70mm, f2.8, 64 ISO. Above: Nikon 24-70/2.8G ED on a D800 at 70mm, f2.8, 100 ISO. Above: Tamron SP 24-70/2.8 VC on a D800 at 70mm, f2.8, 100 ISO. When compared to its predecessor and its main competitor the new lens shows the best FX-corner of the bunch. And at the shorter focal lengths by a large margin! It has a fast maximum aperture of f/2.8, making it great for low light photography. It also has Canon’s latest optical technology for sharpness and reduced distortion. Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR Lens: This Nikon lens is a great option for those who want excellent image quality with fast autofocus. Above from left to right: Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8 S, Z 24-120mm f4 S, AF-S 24-120mm f4G VR on FTZ adapter, Z 24-200mm f4-6.3 VR Compared to Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f4G VR The Nikon 24-120/4.0G VR shows it’s age in this comparison: It simply cannot hold up to Nikon’s new design. In this comparison we’ve tested the Sony against the equivalent Canon and Nikon rival models. We’ve chosen the higher resolution 50-Mpix Canon EOS 5DS R to highlight the potential of the Canon combination, but even when tested on the lower 22-Mpix resolution Canon EOS 5D Mark III, the EF 24-70mm F2.8L II still achieves peak sharpness levels similar to the Sony. Nikon Z 800mm f6.3 VR S review; Nikon Z 400mm f2.8 TC VR S review; Nikon Z 28-75mm f2.8 review; Nikon Z 24-120mm f4 S review; Nikon Z 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 review; Nikon Z 40mm f2 review; Nikon Z 28mm f2.8 review; Nikon Z MC 50mm f2.8 review; Nikon Z MC 105mm f2.8 VR S review; Laowa 25mm f2.8 2.5-5x Ultra Macro review; Laowa 15mm f4.5 Zero-D Shift Canon's RF f2.8L lenses are only as expensive as Nikon's Z lenses. 100 more 100 less. Only unique Canon RF lenses like 50mm f1.2 and 28-70mm f2.0 are expensive but they don't have a rival in the market yet. Plus, Canon 35mm f1.8, 85mm f2.0 and 24-105mm f4-7.1 lenses are quite inexpensive. I think Nikon wins on body prices today, not lens prices. Considerably more compact and lightweight than the latest Nikon AF-S 24-70mm lens and at only half the purchase price, it’s a good choice if you don’t need the faster f/2.8 aperture. Read our full Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR review for more details tGslku.

nikon 24 70mm f2 8 vr review